London, Aug 6 (PA Media/dpa/GNA) – FIFA chief Gianni Infantino, has been accused of a “profound abuse of presidential power” by the world playersâ union over his plan to sell stakes in a World Cup company to private investors.
FIFPRO, which is comprised of over 70 player unions worldwide, said footballersâ confidence in FIFA had been “fundamentally broken” by the conduct of Infantino, the global governing bodyâs president. FIFA issued a statement saying “mistakes” had been made in the plans to create FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) but insisted Infantino had the “full support” of the members of its management board present at a meeting in Morocco on Wednesday.
FIFPRO noted the tone of that statement with “deep concern” in a communication issued on Thursday, adding: “The withdrawal of FFE was inevitable. Withdrawing the proposal does not erase what it revealed.” “A plan capable of permanently altering the ownership and governance of the FIFA World Cup, and commercialising the competitions built by generations of players, was conceived in secrecy, negotiated behind closed doors and brought to the brink of agreement before the FIFA Council, the member associations, players and footballâs recognised stakeholders even knew it existed.” “That is not merely a governance failure. It is a profound abuse of presidential power,” the statement added.
“The withdrawal of FFE prevented an irreversible decision. It did not restore the confidence that made such a proposal possible in the first place. That confidence has now been fundamentally broken.” “It cannot be rebuilt through carefully drafted statements, internal reviews or promises to improve processes. Nor can it be restored simply by announcing governance and structural reforms that should always have existed.” âThese reforms are now indispensable. But they are the responsibility of the future, not an absolution of the past,” FIFPRO added âThe players did not create this crisis. They will insist that football emerges from it with stronger institutions, stronger safeguards and leadership worthy of the trust the game demands.â
FIFPRO has also written to FIFA secretary general Mattias Grafstrom outlining its demands for governance reform. Its letter, seen by the Press Association, stated: âThe role of FIFA president exists to protect institutions, not to circumvent them.
The World Cup is not the personal asset of any president. Nor is FIFA itself. They are held in trust for football.â FIFPROâs letter said the FFE proposalâs handling was part of a âbroader patternâ of decisions being taken without proper consultation, citing the introduction of hydration breaks as another example.
FIFPRO said the breaks had been âpresented under the banner of player healthâ but appeared in reality to be âcloser to a proof-of-concept for future commercial exploitation by FFE-type investors than a genuine welfare measureâ. The playersâ body signed a Memorandum of Understanding with FIFA the day before the World Cup kicked off, but wrote in its letter to Grafstrom: âThe FFE episode demonstrated that commitments, however welcome, are of little value if they can be circumvented whenever one individual chooses to act outside the institutional framework.â
GNA